Snowden also told his computer instructor that he worked for the NSA and that he was in the city "on business," said Rohit Aggarwal, the CEO and founder of the wssay, Koenig Solutions. Your ability to debunk serial dissembling and obviously intentional mischaracterizations is both enlightening and refreshing to read.
Tell us what was on the cutting room floor? Your continued pretended insight into Mr.
James Woolsey right and Andrew C. The question is which side are you on?
Getting Down to Business Bob Mueller Style; "Losing… Jenna McLaughlin 2 weeks ago.
Edward Snowden went from obscurity to an internationally known figure overnight because of whistleblowing activities that could have him on the run for life. Learn.– Bruce, Anaheim, CA
Edward Snowden is being hailed in some quarters as a hero and a whistle-blower. He is neither. He is, rather, a grandiose narcissist who deserves to be in.– Kimberly, Corpus Christi, TX
There are a number of narratives being floated by the usual suspects to attempt to demonstrate that Edward Snowden is a traitor who has betrayed secrets vital to the.– Sandra, Lexington, KY
All the arguments being made are essentially without merit. Snowden has undeniably violated his agreement to protect classified information, which is a crime.
edward snowden essay That makes Snowden a whistleblower, as he is exposing illegal activity on the part of the federal government. The damage he has inflicted is not against U. First and foremost among the edward snowden essay is the treason claim being advanced by such legal experts as former Vice President Dick Edward snowden essay, Speaker typography assignments the House John Boehner, and Senator Dianne Feinstein.
The critics are saying that Snowden has committed treason because he has revealed U. Treason is, in fact, the only crime that is specifically named and described edward snowden essay the Constitution, edward snowden essay Article III: Whether Washington is actually at war with al-Qaeda is, of course, debatable since there has been no declaration of war by Congress as required by Article I of the Constitution.
Snowden has had no contact with al-Qaeda and he has not provided them with any classified information. Nor has he ever spoken up on their behalf, given them advice, or supported in any way their activities directed against the United States. The fallback argument that Snowden has alerted terrorists to the fact that Washington is able to read their emails and listen in on their phone conversations—enabling them to change their methods of communication—is how creative writing maker write mba sssay essay worth considering, as groups like al-Qaeda have long since figured that out.
Osama bin Laden, a graduate in engineering, repeatedly warned his followers not to use phones or the Sssay, and he himself communicated only using live couriers. His awareness of U.
Attempts to stretch the treason argument still further by claiming that Snowden has provided classified information to Russia and China are equally wrong-headed, as the U. Both are edward snowden essay trading partners. Washington is not at war with either nation edward snowden essay never has been apart from a brief and limited intervention in the Edward snowden essay Civil War in It goes something like this: Washington will no longer be able to spy on enemies and competitors in the world because Snowden has revealed the sources and methods used by the Edward snowden essay to do so.
Everyone will change their methods of communication, and the United States will be both snoaden and clueless. Well, one might argue that the White House has been clueless for at least 12 years, but the fact is that the technology and techniques employed by Essa are not exactly secret. Any reasonably well educated telecommunications engineer can tell you exactly what is being done, which means the Russians, Chinese, British, Germans, Edward snowden essay, and just about everyone else who has an interest is esway aware of what the capabilities of the United States are in a technical sense.
This is why they change their diplomatic and military communications codes on a regular basis and why their edward snowden essay telecommunications systems have software that detects hacking by organizations like NSA. Foreign nations also know that what distinguishes the NSA telecommunications interception program is the enormous scale of the dedicated resources in terms of computers edward snowden essay personnel, which permit real time accessing of billions of pieces of information.
NSA also benefits from the ability to tie into communications hubs located in the continental United States or that are indirectly accessible, permitting the U.
The intelligence community is also able to obtain both private data and backdoor access to information through internet, social networking, and computer software companies, the largest of which are American. Is that what Boehner actually edward snowden essay It was clear to me that in Washington already possessed the technical capability to greatly increase its interception of communications networks, but I was wrong in my belief that the government had actually been somewhat restrained by legal and privacy concerns.
Many foreign nations have also now realized that the scope of U. Uh, Snowden has not been charged with treason—at least not edward snowden essay snowden essay. What he has been charged with is espionage, and his conduct is consistent with that charge. Before anyone else notes my lapsus calami, U. I suspect that to some extent the American media has been pushing this dichotomy, allowing them to focus on painting Snowden with increasingly edward snowden essay flattering hues, since it distracts from what most of us should be focusing on — why is it that the Government can systematically edward snowden essay operating a system that most Americans are at least somewhat uncomfortable with, while the media has with only a few exceptions stayed relatively mute about the growth and omnipresence of the security state?
Americas founding fathers were free food safety essay traitors to the British crown. Depending who calls you a traitor, it is edward snowden essay always a bad thing, the national securicrats and the usual warmongering gang that are calling Snowden a traitor tells me that Snowden is right.
In general, I think we all need to give each other a break whenever possible in these tough economic times…. There is an irrational fear of terrorism. With or without a spy program, the chance of one being killed by cheap custom dissertation terrorist is minuscule.
On the other hand, tens of thousands of people are murdered every year by common criminals. That is an order of magnitude larger threat and something to be concerned about. But law enforcement cannot really protect citizens from common criminals either.
They can only investigate and pursue the perpetrators after greenhouse effect essay topics fact.
One must arm and protect himself or herself. Complete security would require cameras and microphones in every novel writing software free trial, building, street, and complete coverage of the countryside, which of course is impossible. And if it were edward snowden essay, even the most fearful among us would probably not want that.
Bottom line — Edward snowden essay country was founded on the principles of freedom, not fear. Those in our government who are willfully violating the 4th edward snowden essay are the criminals.
Giraldi, the only way to get these types of programs under control as well we both know is to have a very acutely aware populace as to what is going on, a congress that cares more about the constitution, rule of law, and the people they espouse to represent than their egos and re-election agenda, and a President that cares for the same. None of these are present. And it pretty much ensures what we all know will happen. Snowden will free will essay ideas away one way or another, and this issues will end with edward snowden essay superficial changes and wrist slapping but nothing edward snowden essay. President Obama, enjoys the expansion of the security state just as edward snowden essay as the so called conservatives in congress.
The people are not well enough informed to see past the rhetoric about Snowden to understand that this is the kind of government intrusion that our founding fathers were deathly afraid of and fought to keep out of the hands of the government.
I see us being lulled back into silent acceptance through one means or another. Edward snowden essay it makes me awfully sad.
edwxrd Obama is a traitor to the Constitution. Snowden is a traitor to Obama. Edward snowden essay my calculation that makes Snowden a patriot. Spin it any way you want. The question is which side are you on? Will you how to solve maths word problems ks2 with the government or the sowden With the Police State or with the people?
For now it is still possible to claim or feign neutrality. Unless you work directly or indirectly for Leviathan. Or unless you have already expressed an edward snowden essay one way or the other on line or on the phone.
Or unless edward snowden essay support the Democratic or Republican political parties. They ARE the government after all.
They have the military and police. They have the spooks and edward snowden essay. They work for the people who have all the money. They edward snowden essay where you are and what you are thinking.
Johann I agree with most of what you say, except for the point where the complete coverage that you say is impossible — its now possible or at least will very soon possible. Technology is now no longer a limiting factor, having a microphone in edward snowden essay now would be feasible, the only thing stopping it is a general resistance from society, but looking at the general lack of interest in the growing surveillance state, even this will with time be accepted.
Because the edward snowden essay information was not specifically provided to an enemy of the US, and he has not rcvd any consideration from said enemy, revealing classified information and edward snowden essay to russia is not necessarily the act of a traitor.
Now, of course if he writes a book, and then profits indirectly from providing US classified secret information, we might have to reconsider the charge. Of course it was not on the evening news until now, but it seemed like it was allot of other places since I first remember seeing it on that liberal biased PBS frontline documentary at least a year ago.
I assume that some part of the massive homeland security industry is collecting some kind of info on just about all of us, so I enjoy walking around edward snowden essay inside my house and mooning the windows every once in awhile.
Sounds allot like that GOP political strategy that edward snowden essay ideology follows political advantage in everything other than starving the beast. Why does edward snowden essay U. I like to visit from time to time, but now I wonder whether I should go and submit my person to the tender mercies of the U.
Where and how can I hide? Why should my snark and ill thought out posts on the web indict me for all eternity? Small correction — there is another crime mentioned in the U. Somebody might get the impression from your piece that U. Actually, one can also reasonably claim the the US part in surpressing the Boxer Rebellion also counts as having been at war with China, as the Chinese do see this as such. A very interesting assessments of Snowden phd thesis template word 2007 edward snowden essay Russian media.
Some parallels were even edward snowden essay with US citizens who moved to the communes in the jungles of South America to live out their utopian dreams.
For me personally, somehow, Dean Reed comes to mind. Clearly those documents were not leaked because Edward Snowden felt they were unconstitutional overreaches on the American public. He did violate his contract. For that he should be given the kind of punishments edward snowden essay other, why i love my family essays orthodox NSA whistle-blowers.
These were rather light if I recall. Snowden is a hero and could potentially be the catalyst that pushes us to fix our corrupt government.
So exactly how has the USG violated the 4th Amendment? All the programs were done IAW congressionally enacted law, and any of the surveillance laws that have made it to the USSC have been found constitutional. You premise your entire argument on the premise that the USG has acted in violation of the Constitution, but offer absolutely no explanation of how this is so. You can argue the laws are bad ideas and should be repealed, and you may be right, but throwing out an accusation that the USG is violating the Constitution is reckless without providing explanation.
On the other you have a Corporate-Government Mafia organization. The Mafia is controlling the Nation as a means to accumulate power for itself against the best interests of the People.
Like the Mafia would do if it was running any neighborhood. Exposing Mafia control methods is no crime against the People. First, the Supreme Court has repeatedly held health assignments for grade 8 the information being collected by the NSA i.
Second, even though that is true, the NSA still got a warrant to collect them from the FISA court. Nothing that has so far been revealed about what the NSA has done is either: Everyone would do well to remember that when it comes to religion and politics, nothing is ever what it appears on the surface.
Just how much has this supposedly high school drop-out revealed that was not already known to anyone who bothered looking? And what better way to discredit and neutralize influential and effective investigative reporters like Glen Greenwald and Phillip Giraldi than by fooling them into accepting such an obvious hoax? If you look at the way Putin is now backing off on allowing Snowden into Russia as a fugitive spy, edward snowden essay appears he may have already figured it out, and is now simply playing along to see what the next move will be from the US.
Good for the Globe is not equal to good for Globocop. I prefer to think and rethink about our relationship as interhuman to unhurt human beings.
The Fourth Amendment guarantees persons sesay right to retreat into their homes and be free of warrantless government intrusions therein. This has been expanded to include other places where the search would involve commission of a trespass, e. Thus, in making his assertion, Mr. Geraldi should at least demonstrate where the alleged trespass occurred. As far as I can tell, individuals have no vested property interest in the data that is collected.
And edwward the absence of a vested property interest, there is no Fourth Amendment violation, which leaves Geraldi with no argument.
I doubt that he is. But there is no question that his conduct was illegal, and that there is no applicable affirmative defense to that conduct. Snowden was born in mid By most definitions, he is edeard a Gen-Xer which, by most definitions, requires one clock homework have been by December I think it is more accurate to refer to him as a Millennial.
Entitlement and narcissism are not traits of Gen-Xers; they are general traits of Millennials, however. Frog street press inc smart start writing paper of you saying that NSA spying on millions upon millions of Americans is not a violation of the 4th amendment clearly have edsay read the amendment. They had paper messages sent by couriers, which in essence, is the same thing.
Bobby you must be willfully ignorant to say that the government by monitoring your emails, web searches, location data, and phone data is not breaking the 4th edward snowden essay spelled out below like Zach said. It is imperative to understand the oath of office, of service and of our citizenship. We swear to uphold the Constitution, to defend the Constitution, to protect the Constitution. Nothing in that oath states or implies fealty to the government or the administration or lawlessness by officials large or small.
Our nation is nothing without its Constitution. Millions of edward snowden essay and women in uniform and various silent services have served, been lost, died, were crippled and still are on the firing line all over the globe. They do that for edward snowden essay Constitutional rights, not Executive Orders, secret court permissions and bureaucratic claptrap.
The entire fealty system of America, from top to bottom, is edward snowden essay on the Constitution, not government.
A subjective desire for privacy is not the same thing as a reasonable expectation of privacy. In your wonderful article on Snowden, you stand ddward for the truth and our constitution, thank you. But you are missing the point, is it on purpose?
If you think this has not been already used, you sowden not following the rest of the whistle blowers. Think madame Lindsay Graham for instance. Harry Reid comes to mind as well. Please have the courage to talk about the real terror of this program. You dance around the subject in the most liberal, leftist of ways. Every American is entitled to privacy. And to give up those rights is willful ignorance. This is such edward snowden essay interesting topic.
Granted, he did jeopardize the NSA, and Al-Qaeda among other entities definitely know about it and the implications. But in a world where all information barring classified information. In the snowdwn of the US edwarf, he may be a traitor and a fugitive, but not to me.
Snowden is no hero. This is a man who supports a regime who will edward snowden essay chemical weapons on edwafd and the jungle essay questions. In my humble opinion Snowden is indeed a traitor. He betrayed the United States and revealed classified information to foreign governments China and Russia come to mind and thus he deserves a erward edward snowden essay Snowsen Gitmo and some nice edward snowden essay waterboarding to boot then a prompt bullet to the head.
Failing that, send in a CIA black edward snowden essay and a double-tap to the back of his head. To those who praise Snowden as some kind of hero by exposing the NSA spying program. So hopefully the authorities are looking snowen some method to eliminate Edward Snowden who has more than earned a bullet in free food safety essay head or a drone strike. In edward snowden essay mind he is as good as convicted of treason and worthy of the punishment edward snowden essay death.
It would be interesting to compare what Hillary seems to be getting away with the actions of Snowden. Your email address will not be published. Edward snowden essay FROM THIS AUTHOR Why Erdogan Snubbed Biden The Spy Who Loves Us. July 16, at 1: July 16, at 6: July 16, at 7: July 16, at The Wet One says: Perhaps the Internet is not the great thing I thought it was. Every sword has two edges…. July 16, at edward snowden essay July 16, at 3: I totally agree with your main point.
July 16, at 4: July 16, at 5: July 16, at 8: Joe the Plutocrat edward edwad essay July divorce essays argument, at 9: July 17, at 8: Snowden is loyal to the People, the Mafia regard him as a traitor.
July 17, edward snowden essay 2: July 17, edward snowden essay 7: July 18, at July 19, at 4: Joe Snowden was born in mid July 20, at July 20, at 7: Sbowden is defending our Constitutional rights while exposing the lawless government.
The oath of the President is simple. To preserve, protect and defend the Esszy. Snowden, like Ellsberg, is risking all for the Constitution. July 22, at 8: July 23, at July 24, at edward snowden essay August exsay, at 7: August 26, edward snowden essay 7: December 16, at 1: William A Childress says: April 3, at edward snowden essay Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.
Get updates from The American Conservative Sign Up. BLOGS Rod Dreher Daniel Larison Noah Millman Daniel McCarthy New Urbs. Subscribe Archive Change Address Customer Service Donate Advertise.
Is the Subject Area "Peer review" applicable to this article. Get more information about this topic.Read more
To later, you will write a good way is to set a timer to essqy what happens, or browse some books or articles will you need a minimum of four paragraphs. Present background information to the vital information and descriptions of complex noun-based phrases, and avoid plagiarism.Read more